Lol

This app makes sense, but fails to refute anything. When a claim (like one I would make) said there is no empirical data only computer models which are unreliable, I stead of arguing these:
1) computer models are accurate
Or
2) examples of empirical data

It provides more computer models...

It also spreads false information, its refutation to the ground censor data is based on data that claims same data regardless of urban heat island effect, yet the facts show almost no heating in rural areas. (also forgets most scanners where moved from rural to urban the same time we saw heat increases).

Also it ignores other data on the sun: mars is warming too without emissions, hinting to solar global warming.

It cherry picks data and spreads falsehoods=1 star, I give it two for at least trying to refute us skeptics.

Alexander7731 about Skeptical Science, v1.2.1